1. Industry & Trade

Alaska FDF Remains Defiant of MSC

Friday May 18, 2012
    afdf MSC finds a replacement.
    As last reported, Alaska's major salmon processors and the Alaska Fisheries Development Foundation voluntarily opted out of the Marine Stewardship Council's sustainable fisheries program. AFDF announced its departure in January, saying it needed to broaden the marketing message. That move bucked the popular MSC-marketing campaign that boasts the catch was taken sustainably.
    A new fisheries group has sprung up to fill the hole; the Purse Seine Vessel Owners Association, out of Seattle.
    The Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute noted that Alaska salmon has been awarded Responsible Fisheries Management Certification by an independent, third-party assessment conducted by Global Trust Certification Ltd. It was also based on U.S. Food and Agriculture Organization Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, which also has certified pollock , halibut, sablefish, king crabs and snow crabs. ASMI says they were promoting sustainable fisheries practices long before MSC and sustainability became mainstream.
    Remarkably, MSC says the ASMI program is inferior, and says fishermen have to pay for it, while ASMI says it is, in fact free - as advertised. In return, ASMI claimed the high road and said it would not participate in a negative campaign but continue to boast about its certification.
    But salmon fishermen worry its increase in business over the last few years could be in jeopardy without the MSC label. That caused the membership of the Purse Seine Vessel Owners' Association to step up as the MSC client to continue the certification program. It has been reported that MSC has agreed to reimburse PSVOA 75 percent of the cost of the certification. PSVOA expects processors who want to carry the label will pay the rest.
    To the ASMI, they believe that for the salmon fishermen the label does have value to some fisheries.
    As far as the rift between ASMI and MSC, that's best summarized by Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell, who remarked "Unfortunately, our effort to provide choice in credible certification alternatives became embroiled in the debate over who defines sustainability for the market. This debate over who defines sustainability is evolving into an issue of market access and governance where one party seeks control, which concerns me greatly."

Government Will Compensate Cooke Aquaculture For Ordered Destruction

Monday May 14, 2012
    Hundreds of thousands of salmon were ordered destroyed due to infectious salmon anaemia.
pens
    The Canadian Food and Inspection Agency will compensate Cooke Aquaculture, a New Brunswick-based salmon farming company, for the ordered distruction of all the remaining fish on a farm near Shelburne Harbour after the CFIA confirmed cases of infectious salmon anaemia. Hundreds of thousands of salmon were ordered destroyed the last week in April.
    In February, two pens of fish had to be destroyed when officials first suspected, then confirmed ISA in those cages. ISA poses no known danger to humans. A CFIA spokesman has said an assessment party has been to the site to begin determining the amount of compensation. The party will use information from an independent business publisher to determine the market value.
    Compensation may include costs related to the destruction and disposal of the fish, and the market value will reflect a reasonable value that an farmer could expect to receive up to the maximum of $30. That protocol is laid out in the Compensation for Destroyed Animals Regulations. The assessment team consisted of an industry representative, two CFIA economists and a CFIA veterinarian.
    The Shelburne Harbour fish farm will remain under quarantine for several months while all the fish are removed to a compost facility, and all the pens, cages and nets are cleaned and sanitized.
    A spokesperson for Cooke Aquaculture said all its sites in the Shelburne area will not be used until May 2013. The company also plans to move forward with plans for further expansion in Nova Scotia, citing that diverse locations will allow the company to continue should another contamination occur.

Red Snapper Ban To Be Judged

Friday May 11, 2012
    Decision could be made this summer.
red
    A two year ban on red snapper fishing could be lifted in the South Atlantic if all the data indicates the species if not in danger
    The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council's June meeting featured will discuss an "emergency rule" for the red snapper. The council has requested a National Marine Fisheries' science center update of a report on a comparison of how many red snapper are being unintentionally caught by commercial and recreational fishermen despite the ban.
    The council banned red snapper fishing in January 2010 due to concerns that stocks in the Atlantic were being depleted. Due to a suspicion that it was being over-fished, federal law requires that emergency action take place.
    On the other side of the debate, fishermen questioned the science.
    In addition to the ban, a rebuilding plan for the fish assumed one level of accidental bycatch, snapper caught accidentally and thrown back.
    The council now wants to compare how the real numbers for the amount of snapper thrown back during the ban compare to estimates used in the rebuilding plan. That information comes from commercial fishing logbooks, charter boat logs and a marine recreational information program. If less fish are being caught than the plan predicted, the council could reopen the fishery. If the bycatch exceed those numbers, there could be ramifications.
      According to the SAFMC, the estimates for bycatch were 346,000 lbs. in 2010 and 421,000 lbs. in 2011. The council hopes to receive the report before committee meetings begin June 11, and any decision either way would have to acted on the full council which meets June 15.

Fishermen Get Scallopmen's Leftover Allotment of Yellowtail

Tuesday May 8, 2012
yello
    Government shows understanding.
    In the New Bedford area, the yellowtail flounder allocation is divided each year between the scallop and groundfish fisheries. This year, the scallop fishery's share was increased to approximately 679,024 pounds (53 percent ) while the groundfish industry was reduced to 480,608 pounds (80 percent).
    Yellowtail flounder are bycatch in the scallop fishery. According to NOAA's latest statistics, the scallop fleet had taken only 59.8 tons, or around 30 percent of what they are allowed as of September 2012. . The season opens March 1, next year.
    Disaster had almost been a lead pipe cinch for the groundfish fleet last week when government regulators decreed an 80 percent reduction in the catch limit on yellowtail for the 2012 fishing year. Yellowtail landings account for roughly 20 percent of groundfish revenue in New Bedford and fishermen need the allocation to enable them to land other stocks, such as winter flounder and haddock, live with yellowtail.
    Working with fishermen over the past two years, officials at the School for Marine Science and Technology, Department of Estuarine and Ocean Science, Department of Fisheries Oceanography, Marine Fisheries Institute, in New Bedford, MA have developed a yellowtail avoidance program for scallopers that has proven highly successful. It identifies areas where yellowtail are plentiful and directs participating scallop boats elsewhere. About 225 boats will be participating in the program.
    Groundfishermen will have to wait until January 2013 to see how much yellowtail might be reallocated. NOAA and the New England Fishery Management Council are also looking for other ways to help fishermen affected by the reduction and more collaborative research projects aimed at reducing bycatch are planned.

Discuss in my forum

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.